@COMMENT This file was generated by bib2html.pl <https://sourceforge.net/projects/bib2html/> version 0.94
@COMMENT written by Patrick Riley <http://sourceforge.net/users/patstg/>
@COMMENT This file came from Nicolas Maudet's publication pages at
@COMMENT http://www.lamsade.dauphine.fr/~maudet/publications/
@article{HulstijnMaudetJCSR06,
  author =        {Joris Hulstijn and Nicolas Maudet},
  title =         {Uptake and Joint Action},
  journal =       {Journal of Cognitive Systems Research},
  year =          {2006},
  note =          {Special issue on Cognition and Collective Intentionality.} 
  volume = {7},
  number = {2--3},
  pages = {175--191},
  publisher = {Elsevier},  
  abstract = {In natural language dialogue, the way a responder `takes up' the
initiative of a participant, largely influences the further course
of the dialogue. This uptake mechanism can be understood as  a
negotiation at a meta level: an initiative counts as a bid of a
dialogue game; an appropriate response counts as an acceptance of
the bid. We propose to extend this account of uptake to other
conventional joint activities besides dialogue. We show that for an
uptake mechanism to be effective, a joint activity must be
characterisable in terms of initiatives and responses, with
projection rules that indicate what initiatives count as a bid for a
joint action, and appropriateness rules that indicate what responses
count as appropriate.}
}