Nicolas Maudet
LAMSADE
Univ. Paris 9 Dauphine
75775 Paris Cedex 16
maudet[at]lamsade.dauphine.fr
(anti-spam [at] for @)
Publications
• by Date • by Publication Type • by Research Category •
Uptake and Joint Action
Joris Hulstijn and Nicolas Maudet. Uptake and Joint Action. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research, 7(2--3):175–191, Elsevier, 2006. Special issue on Cognition and Collective Intentionality.
Download
Abstract
In natural language dialogue, the way a responder `takes up' theinitiative of a participant, largely influences the further courseof the dialogue. This uptake mechanism can be understood as anegotiation at a meta level: an initiative counts as a bid of adialogue game; an appropriate response counts as an acceptance ofthe bid. We propose to extend this account of uptake to otherconventional joint activities besides dialogue. We show that for anuptake mechanism to be effective, a joint activity must becharacterisable in terms of initiatives and responses, withprojection rules that indicate what initiatives count as a bid for ajoint action, and appropriateness rules that indicate what responsescount as appropriate.
BibTeX
@article{HulstijnMaudetJCSR06,
author = {Joris Hulstijn and Nicolas Maudet},
title = {Uptake and Joint Action},
journal = {Journal of Cognitive Systems Research},
year = {2006},
note = {Special issue on Cognition and Collective Intentionality.}
volume = {7},
number = {2--3},
pages = {175--191},
publisher = {Elsevier},
abstract = {In natural language dialogue, the way a responder `takes up' the
initiative of a participant, largely influences the further course
of the dialogue. This uptake mechanism can be understood as a
negotiation at a meta level: an initiative counts as a bid of a
dialogue game; an appropriate response counts as an acceptance of
the bid. We propose to extend this account of uptake to other
conventional joint activities besides dialogue. We show that for an
uptake mechanism to be effective, a joint activity must be
characterisable in terms of initiatives and responses, with
projection rules that indicate what initiatives count as a bid for a
joint action, and appropriateness rules that indicate what responses
count as appropriate.}
}
Generated by bib2html.pl (written by Patrick Riley ) on Mon May 09, 2011 17:34:33