Acceptance ratio of some Theoretical Computer Science Conferences

Here is a list of some acceptance rates of Theoretical Computer Science (TCS) Conferences (and some of computational biology). For each year, you can find the (Number Of Accepted Papers) / (Number Of Submitted Papers), and the corresponding ratio. These data are (manually) collected from the proceedings.

Obviously, the ratio doesn't mean anything about the conference quality or ranking (see for example this post of Lance Fortnow)! See also this interesting experiment on the conferences decisions, and this humoristic study.
Contact me for any remark or suggestion.

Conference Name Year:Acc./Sub.=>Ratio Average ratio Usual month Core 2017 rank GGS 2017 rank
AAIM
2016 : 18 / 41 => 43.9%
2014 : 30 / 45 => 66.7%
2013 : 33 / 60 => 55%
2012 : 33 / 81 => 40.7%
2010 : 31 / 50 => 62%
2009 : 25 / 41 => 61%
2008 : 30 / 53 => 56.6%
2007 : 39 / 120 => 32.5%
48.7%JulyCWiP
ALENEX
2017 : 21 / 52 => 40.4%
2016 : 15 / 38 => 39.5%
2015 : 15 / 54 => 27.8%
2014 : 15 / 68 => 22.1%
2013 : 15 / 47 => 31.9%
2012 : 15 / 49 => 30.6%
2011 : 15 / 47 => 31.9%
2010 : 15 / 53 => 28.3%
2009 : 15 / 64 => 23.4%
2007 : 15 / 60 => 25%
29.3%JanuaryAA-
APBC
2012 : 42 / 129 => 32.6%
2011 : 54 / 164 => 32.9%
2010 : 67 / 231 => 29%
2009 : 64 / 204 => 31.4%
2008 : 36 / 100 => 36%
2007 : 35 / 104 => 33.7%
32%JanuaryBWiP
APPROX
2017 : 22 / 60 => 36.7%
2016 : 20 / 40 => 50%
2015 : 26 / 61 => 42.6%
2014 : 31 / 64 => 48.4%
2013 : 23 / 46 => 50%
2012 : 28 / 70 => 40%
2011 : 29 / 66 => 43.9%
2010 : 28 / 66 => 42.4%
2009 : 25 / 56 => 44.6%
2008 : 20 / 42 => 47.6%
44.1%AugustAB
AlCoB
2017 : 10 / 24 => 41.7%
2016 : 13 / 23 => 56.5%
2015 : 11 / 23 => 47.8%
2014 : 20 / 39 => 51.3%
49.5%August
CALDAM
2017 : 32 / 103 => 31.1%
2016 : 30 / 91 => 33%
2015 : 26 / 58 => 44.8%
34.9%February
CATS
2013 : 7 / 15 => 46.7%
2012 : 18 / 34 => 52.9%
2011 : 20 / 38 => 52.6%
2010 : 12 / 28 => 42.9%
2009 : 19 / 43 => 44.2%
2008 : 17 / 28 => 60.7%
2007 : 18 / 29 => 62.1%
51.6%FebruaryWiP
CIAA
2016 : 26 / 49 => 53.1%
2015 : 22 / 49 => 44.9%
2014 : 21 / 36 => 58.3%
2013 : 25 / 43 => 58.1%
2012 : 21 / 53 => 39.6%
2011 : 20 / 38 => 52.6%
2010 : 26 / 52 => 50%
2009 : 23 / 42 => 54.8%
2008 : 24 / 40 => 60%
2007 : 23 / 79 => 29.1%
48%JulyBWiP
CIAC
2015 : 30 / 93 => 32.3%
2013 : 31 / 75 => 41.3%
2010 : 30 / 114 => 26.3%
2006 : 33 / 80 => 41.3%
2003 : 23 / 57 => 40.4%
2000 : 21 / 41 => 51.2%
36.5%MayCWiP
COCOA
2016 : 60 / 122 => 49.2%
2015 : 59 / 125 => 47.2%
2014 : 56 / 133 => 42.1%
2013 : 36 / 72 => 50%
2012 : 33 / 57 => 57.9%
2011 : 30 / 65 => 46.2%
2010 : 49 / 108 => 45.4%
2009 : 50 / 103 => 48.5%
2008 : 44 / 84 => 52.4%
48%DecemberBWiP
COCOON
2016 : 50 / 113 => 44.2%
2014 : 51 / 110 => 46.4%
2013 : 56 / 120 => 46.7%
2012 : 50 / 121 => 41.3%
2011 : 54 / 136 => 39.7%
2010 : 54 / 133 => 40.6%
2009 : 51 / 125 => 40.8%
2008 : 66 / 172 => 38.4%
2007 : 51 / 154 => 33.1%
2006 : 52 / 137 => 38%
40.5%AugustAB
COLT
2017 : 74 / 228 => 32.5%
2016 : 53 / 203 => 26.1%
2015 : 62 / 178 => 34.8%
2014 : 45 / 140 => 32.1%
2013 : 47 / 90 => 52.2%
2012 : 47 / 140 => 33.6%
33.5%JuneA*A+
CPM
2016 : 29 / 52 => 55.8%
2015 : 34 / 83 => 41%
2014 : 28 / 54 => 51.9%
2013 : 21 / 51 => 41.2%
2012 : 33 / 60 => 55%
2011 : 36 / 70 => 51.4%
2010 : 28 / 53 => 52.8%
2009 : 27 / 63 => 42.9%
2008 : 25 / 78 => 32.1%
2007 : 32 / 64 => 50%
2006 : 33 / 88 => 37.5%
2005 : 37 / 129 => 28.7%
2004 : 36 / 79 => 45.6%
43.2%JuneBB
CSR
2016 : 28 / 71 => 39.4%
2015 : 25 / 61 => 41%
2014 : 27 / 76 => 35.5%
2013 : 29 / 52 => 55.8%
2012 : 28 / 66 => 42.4%
2011 : 29 / 76 => 38.2%
2010 : 30 / 62 => 48.4%
2009 : 29 / 66 => 43.9%
2008 : 27 / 62 => 43.5%
2007 : 34 / 95 => 35.8%
41.6%JuneCWiP
CiE
2016 : 18 / 40 => 45%
2015 : 26 / 64 => 40.6%
2014 : 42 / 78 => 53.8%
2013 : 48 / 152 => 31.6%
2012 : 53 / 178 => 29.8%
2011 : 22 / 55 => 40%
2010 : 28 / 90 => 31.1%
2009 : 34 / 100 => 34%
2008 : 36 / 108 => 33.3%
2007 : 50 / 167 => 29.9%
34.6%JuneCB-
Computational Complexity Conference (CCC)
2017 : 33 / 98 => 33.7%
2016 : 34 / 91 => 37.4%
2015 : 30 / 110 => 27.3%
2014 : 29 / 94 => 30.9%
2013 : 29 / 90 => 32.2%
2012 : 34 / 119 => 28.6%
2011 : 30 / 83 => 36.1%
2010 : 25 / 76 => 32.9%
2009 : 37 / 113 => 32.7%
2008 : 32 / 87 => 36.8%
2007 : 30 / 90 => 33.3%
2006 : 28 / 87 => 32.2%
2005 : 30 / 79 => 38%
32.9%JuneAA-
DISC
2017 : 39 / 160 => 24.4%
2016 : 32 / 132 => 24.2%
2015 : 42 / 143 => 29.4%
2014 : 35 / 148 => 23.6%
2013 : 27 / 142 => 19%
2012 : 27 / 119 => 22.7%
2011 : 31 / 136 => 22.8%
2010 : 32 / 135 => 23.7%
23.8%OctoberAB
DLT
2016 : 32 / 48 => 66.7%
2015 : 31 / 54 => 57.4%
2014 : 22 / 38 => 57.9%
2013 : 34 / 63 => 54%
2011 : 34 / 69 => 49.3%
2010 : 32 / 60 => 53.3%
2009 : 35 / 70 => 50%
2008 : 36 / 102 => 35.3%
2007 : 32 / 74 => 43.2%
2006 : 36 / 63 => 57.1%
2005 : 29 / 73 => 39.7%
49.4%JuneBB-
Design and Analysis of Algorithms (MedAlg)
2012 : 18 / 44 => 40.9%
40.9%December
European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA) Track A
2017 : 58 / 229 => 25.3%
2016 : 63 / 230 => 27.4%
2015 : 25 / 93 => 26.9%
2014 : 57 / 221 => 25.8%
2013 : 53 / 229 => 23.1%
2012 : 56 / 231 => 24.2%
2011 : 55 / 209 => 26.3%
2010 : 56 / 206 => 27.2%
2009 : 56 / 222 => 25.2%
2008 : 51 / 147 => 34.7%
2007 : 50 / 165 => 30.3%
2006 : 52 / 215 => 24.2%
26.4%SeptemberAA-
EvoCOP
2016 : 17 / 44 => 38.6%
2015 : 19 / 46 => 41.3%
2014 : 20 / 42 => 47.6%
2013 : 23 / 50 => 46%
2012 : 22 / 48 => 45.8%
2011 : 22 / 42 => 52.4%
2009 : 21 / 53 => 39.6%
2008 : 24 / 69 => 34.8%
2007 : 21 / 81 => 25.9%
39.8%AprilWiP
FAW
2016 : 25 / 54 => 46.3%
2015 : 28 / 65 => 43.1%
2014 : 30 / 65 => 46.2%
2013 : 33 / 60 => 55%
2012 : 33 / 81 => 40.7%
2011 : 35 / 91 => 38.5%
2010 : 28 / 57 => 49.1%
2009 : 33 / 87 => 37.9%
2008 : 33 / 80 => 41.3%
43.4%MayBWiP
FCT
2015 : 27 / 60 => 45%
2013 : 26 / 58 => 44.8%
2011 : 28 / 78 => 35.9%
2009 : 29 / 67 => 43.3%
2007 : 39 / 147 => 26.5%
2005 : 46 / 105 => 43.8%
37.9%AugustAB
FOCS
2016 : 85 / 307 => 27.7%
2015 : 86 / 314 => 27.4%
2014 : 68 / 273 => 24.9%
2013 : 79 / 281 => 28.1%
2012 : 79 / 248 => 31.9%
2011 : 85 / 292 => 29.1%
2010 : 81 / 270 => 30%
2009 : 75 / 249 => 30.1%
2008 : 79 / 276 => 28.6%
2007 : 66 / 302 => 21.9%
2006 : 71 / 240 => 29.6%
2005 : 62 / 272 => 22.8%
27.6%OctoberA*A++
FOSSACS
2017 : 32 / 101 => 31.7%
2016 : 31 / 85 => 36.5%
2015 : 28 / 93 => 30.1%
2014 : 28 / 106 => 26.4%
2013 : 28 / 109 => 25.7%
2012 : 29 / 100 => 29%
2011 : 30 / 100 => 30%
2010 : 25 / 86 => 29.1%
2009 : 30 / 102 => 29.4%
2008 : 25 / 103 => 24.3%
2007 : 25 / 103 => 24.3%
2006 : 28 / 107 => 26.2%
28.4%MarchAB
FSTTCS
2016 : 44 / 112 => 39.3%
2015 : 42 / 117 => 35.9%
2014 : 47 / 162 => 29%
2013 : 40 / 111 => 36%
2012 : 43 / 121 => 35.5%
2011 : 37 / 116 => 31.9%
2010 : 38 / 128 => 29.7%
2009 : 40 / 117 => 34.2%
2008 : 36 / 117 => 30.8%
2007 : 40 / 135 => 29.6%
2006 : 34 / 155 => 21.9%
31.7%DecemberBB
FUN
2016 : 25 / 61 => 41%
2014 : 29 / 49 => 59.2%
2012 : 34 / 56 => 60.7%
2010 : 32 / 54 => 59.3%
2007 : 20 / 41 => 48.8%
53.6%JuneBWiP
ICALP A (if possible)
2017 : 88 / 296 => 29.7%
2016 : 89 / 319 => 27.9%
2015 : 143 / 507 => 28.2%
2014 : 136 / 484 => 28.1%
2013 : 124 / 422 => 29.4%
2012 : 71 / 248 => 28.6%
2011 : 60 / 222 => 27%
2010 : 60 / 222 => 27%
2009 : 62 / 223 => 27.8%
2008 : 70 / 269 => 26%
2007 : 41 / 149 => 27.5%
28.1%JulyAA
ICCS
2014 : 64 / 184 => 34.8%
2011 : 220 / 580 => 37.9%
2007 : 80 / 360 => 22.2%
2005 : 134 / 464 => 28.9%
31.4%JuneAB
ICGT (Graph Transformation)
2015 : 15 / 27 => 55.6%
55.6%JulyBB
ICML
2015 : 270 / 1037 => 26%
2012 : 242 / 890 => 27.2%
2011 : 152 / 589 => 25.8%
2010 : 152 / 594 => 25.6%
2009 : 160 / 595 => 26.9%
2008 : 158 / 583 => 27.1%
2003 : 119 / 371 => 32.1%
26.9%AugustA*A++
IFIP TCS
2014 : 11 / 38 => 28.9%
2012 : 25 / 48 => 52.1%
41.9%SeptemberCWiP
IJCAI
2016 : 551 / 2294 => 24%
2015 : 572 / 1996 => 28.7%
2013 : 413 / 1473 => 28%
2011 : 400 / 1325 => 30.2%
2009 : 331 / 1291 => 25.6%
2007 : 470 / 1365 => 34.4%
28.1%JulyA*A++
IPCO
2017 : 36 / 125 => 28.8%
2016 : 33 / 125 => 26.4%
2014 : 34 / 143 => 23.8%
2013 : 33 / 98 => 33.7%
2011 : 33 / 110 => 30%
2010 : 34 / 135 => 25.2%
2008 : 32 / 95 => 33.7%
2007 : 36 / 120 => 30%
28.5%AprilAB
IPEC
2016 : 28 / 48 => 58.3%
2015 : 32 / 51 => 62.7%
2014 : 27 / 42 => 64.3%
2013 : 29 / 58 => 50%
2012 : 21 / 37 => 56.8%
2011 : 21 / 40 => 52.5%
2010 : 19 / 32 => 59.4%
2009 : 25 / 52 => 48.1%
2008 : 17 / 32 => 53.1%
2004 : 25 / 47 => 53.2%
55.6%JulyBB
ISAAC
2016 : 62 / 155 => 40%
2015 : 65 / 180 => 36.1%
2014 : 60 / 171 => 35.1%
2013 : 67 / 177 => 37.9%
2012 : 68 / 174 => 39.1%
2011 : 76 / 187 => 40.6%
2010 : 77 / 182 => 42.3%
2009 : 120 / 279 => 43%
2008 : 78 / 229 => 34.1%
2007 : 77 / 220 => 35%
2006 : 73 / 255 => 28.6%
37.3%DecemberAB
ISBRA
2016 : 25 / 77 => 32.5%
2015 : 34 / 98 => 34.7%
2014 : 33 / 119 => 27.7%
2013 : 25 / 46 => 54.3%
2012 : 26 / 66 => 39.4%
2011 : 36 / 92 => 39.1%
2010 : 20 / 57 => 35.1%
2009 : 26 / 55 => 47.3%
2008 : 35 / 94 => 37.2%
2007 : 55 / 144 => 38.2%
37.1%MayWiP
ISCO
2016 : 38 / 98 => 38.8%
2014 : 37 / 97 => 38.1%
2012 : 37 / 94 => 39.4%
38.8%MayCWiP
ISMB/ECCB
2015 : 42 / 241 => 17.4%
2013 : 40 / 233 => 17.2%
2011 : 48 / 258 => 18.6%
2009 : 46 / 242 => 19%
2007 : 66 / 417 => 15.8%
17.4%JulyBB
ITCS Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science
2016 : 40 / 145 => 27.6%
2015 : 45 / 159 => 28.3%
2014 : 48 / 116 => 41.4%
2013 : 49 / 123 => 39.8%
2012 : 39 / 93 => 41.9%
34.7%January
IWOCA
2016 : 35 / 87 => 40.2%
2015 : 29 / 90 => 32.2%
2014 : 32 / 69 => 46.4%
2013 : 33 / 91 => 36.3%
2012 : 32 / 88 => 36.4%
2011 : 30 / 71 => 42.3%
2010 : 31 / 85 => 36.5%
2009 : 41 / 100 => 41%
38.6%JulyBWiP
KDD
2017 : 64 / 748 => 8.6%
2015 : 160 / 819 => 19.5%
2014 : 151 / 1036 => 14.6%
2013 : 125 / 726 => 17.2%
2012 : 133 / 755 => 17.6%
2011 : 126 / 714 => 17.6%
2010 : 101 / 679 => 14.9%
2009 : 139 / 659 => 21.1%
2008 : 118 / 593 => 19.9%
2007 : 111 / 573 => 19.4%
16.8%AugustA*A++
LAGOS
2013 : 60 / 131 => 45.8%
2009 : 58 / 126 => 46%
45.9%April
LATA
2016 : 42 / 119 => 35.3%
2015 : 53 / 115 => 46.1%
2014 : 45 / 116 => 38.8%
2013 : 45 / 97 => 46.4%
2012 : 41 / 114 => 36%
2011 : 36 / 91 => 39.6%
40.2%MarchCWiP
LATIN
2016 : 52 / 131 => 39.7%
2014 : 65 / 192 => 33.9%
2012 : 55 / 153 => 35.9%
2010 : 56 / 155 => 36.1%
2008 : 66 / 242 => 27.3%
2006 : 66 / 224 => 29.5%
2004 : 59 / 178 => 33.1%
2002 : 44 / 104 => 42.3%
33.6%AprilBB
MFCS
2017 : 80 / 192 => 41.7%
2016 : 84 / 195 => 43.1%
2015 : 82 / 201 => 40.8%
2014 : 95 / 270 => 35.2%
2013 : 67 / 191 => 35.1%
2012 : 63 / 162 => 38.9%
2011 : 48 / 129 => 37.2%
2010 : 56 / 149 => 37.6%
2009 : 56 / 148 => 37.8%
2008 : 45 / 119 => 37.8%
2007 : 61 / 167 => 36.5%
2006 : 62 / 174 => 35.6%
38.1%AugustAA-
OPODIS
2016 : 31 / 84 => 36.9%
2015 : 31 / 91 => 34.1%
2014 : 32 / 98 => 32.7%
2013 : 19 / 41 => 46.3%
2012 : 24 / 89 => 27%
2011 : 26 / 96 => 27.1%
2009 : 23 / 72 => 31.9%
2008 : 30 / 102 => 29.4%
32.1%DecemberBB
PODC
2016 : 40 / 137 => 29.2%
2015 : 45 / 191 => 23.6%
2014 : 39 / 141 => 27.7%
2013 : 37 / 145 => 25.5%
2012 : 35 / 142 => 24.6%
2011 : 34 / 129 => 26.4%
2010 : 39 / 179 => 21.8%
2009 : 27 / 110 => 24.5%
25.2%JulyA*A+
RECOMB
2017 : 22 / 184 => 12%
2016 : 35 / 172 => 20.3%
2015 : 36 / 170 => 21.2%
2014 : 35 / 154 => 22.7%
2013 : 32 / 167 => 19.2%
2012 : 31 / 200 => 15.5%
2011 : 43 / 153 => 28.1%
2010 : 36 / 176 => 20.5%
2009 : 37 / 166 => 22.3%
2008 : 34 / 193 => 17.6%
2007 : 37 / 170 => 21.8%
2006 : 39 / 217 => 18%
19.7%AprilBA-
RECOMB-CG
2017 : 16 / 32 => 50%
2014 : 20 / 33 => 60.6%
2010 : 24 / 35 => 68.6%
2009 : 19 / 31 => 61.3%
2008 : 19 / 48 => 39.6%
2007 : 14 / 18 => 77.8%
2006 : 17 / 34 => 50%
2005 : 14 / 21 => 66.7%
56.7%October
SEA Symposium on Experimental Algorithms
2016 : 25 / 54 => 46.3%
2015 : 30 / 76 => 39.5%
2014 : 36 / 81 => 44.4%
2013 : 32 / 73 => 43.8%
2012 : 31 / 64 => 48.4%
2011 : 36 / 83 => 43.4%
2010 : 40 / 73 => 54.8%
2009 : 23 / 64 => 35.9%
2007 : 30 / 121 => 24.8%
2006 : 26 / 92 => 28.3%
2005 : 47 / 176 => 26.7%
37.2%JuneBB-
SIROCCO
2016 : 25 / 50 => 50%
2015 : 30 / 78 => 38.5%
2014 : 24 / 51 => 47.1%
2013 : 28 / 67 => 41.8%
2012 : 28 / 54 => 51.9%
2011 : 24 / 57 => 42.1%
2010 : 19 / 37 => 51.4%
2009 : 23 / 53 => 43.4%
2008 : 22 / 52 => 42.3%
2007 : 23 / 66 => 34.8%
2006 : 24 / 68 => 35.3%
42.7%JuneBB
SOCG
2017 : 59 / 148 => 39.9%
2016 : 61 / 161 => 37.9%
2015 : 59 / 154 => 38.3%
38.7%JuneAA
SODA
2017 : 181 / 533 => 34%
2016 : 149 / 527 => 28.3%
2015 : 137 / 495 => 27.7%
2014 : 136 / 485 => 28%
2013 : 135 / 454 => 29.7%
2012 : 138 / 517 => 26.7%
2011 : 136 / 452 => 30.1%
2010 : 135 / 445 => 30.3%
2009 : 135 / 458 => 29.5%
2008 : 135 / 455 => 29.7%
2007 : 139 / 382 => 36.4%
2006 : 135 / 440 => 30.7%
2005 : 135 / 488 => 27.7%
29.8%JanuaryA*A++
SOFSEM
2017 : 34 / 41 => 82.9%
2016 : 43 / 116 => 37.1%
2015 : 42 / 101 => 41.6%
2014 : 40 / 104 => 38.5%
2013 : 37 / 98 => 37.8%
2012 : 43 / 121 => 35.5%
2011 : 41 / 122 => 33.6%
2010 : 53 / 134 => 39.6%
2009 : 49 / 132 => 37.1%
2008 : 57 / 162 => 35.2%
2007 : 69 / 283 => 24.4%
2006 : 45 / 157 => 28.7%
35.2%JanuaryBB
SPIRE
2016 : 25 / 46 => 54.3%
2015 : 34 / 90 => 37.8%
2014 : 20 / 45 => 44.4%
2013 : 18 / 60 => 30%
2012 : 26 / 81 => 32.1%
2011 : 30 / 102 => 29.4%
2010 : 39 / 109 => 35.8%
2009 : 34 / 84 => 40.5%
2008 : 25 / 54 => 46.3%
2007 : 27 / 77 => 35.1%
2006 : 31 / 102 => 30.4%
36.4%OctoberBB
SSS
2016 : 23 / 53 => 43.4%
2015 : 16 / 38 => 42.1%
2014 : 21 / 44 => 47.7%
2013 : 23 / 68 => 33.8%
2012 : 21 / 75 => 28%
2011 : 29 / 79 => 36.7%
2009 : 49 / 126 => 38.9%
37.7%OctoberCWiP
STACS
2017 : 54 / 212 => 25.5%
2016 : 54 / 205 => 26.3%
2015 : 55 / 235 => 23.4%
2014 : 54 / 210 => 25.7%
2013 : 54 / 254 => 21.3%
2012 : 54 / 273 => 19.8%
2011 : 54 / 271 => 19.9%
2010 : 54 / 238 => 22.7%
2009 : 54 / 280 => 19.3%
2008 : 54 / 200 => 27%
2007 : 56 / 400 => 14%
2006 : 54 / 283 => 19.1%
21.3%MarchBB
STOC
2017 : 103 / 422 => 24.4%
2016 : 92 / 370 => 24.9%
2015 : 93 / 347 => 26.8%
2014 : 91 / 319 => 28.5%
2013 : 100 / 360 => 27.8%
2012 : 89 / 303 => 29.4%
2011 : 84 / 304 => 27.6%
2010 : 78 / 279 => 28%
2009 : 77 / 329 => 23.4%
2008 : 80 / 325 => 24.6%
2007 : 77 / 312 => 24.7%
2006 : 78 / 288 => 27.1%
26.3%JuneA*A++
SWAT
2016 : 30 / 90 => 33.3%
2014 : 33 / 134 => 24.6%
2012 : 34 / 127 => 26.8%
2010 : 36 / 78 => 46.2%
2008 : 36 / 111 => 32.4%
2006 : 36 / 154 => 23.4%
2004 : 40 / 121 => 33.1%
30.1%JulyWiP
TAMC
2017 : 45 / 103 => 43.7%
2015 : 35 / 78 => 44.9%
2014 : 27 / 112 => 24.1%
2013 : 31 / 70 => 44.3%
2012 : 40 / 86 => 46.5%
2011 : 51 / 136 => 37.5%
2010 : 35 / 76 => 46.1%
2009 : 39 / 86 => 45.3%
2008 : 48 / 192 => 25%
2007 : 67 / 500 => 13.4%
2006 : 75 / 319 => 23.5%
28%MayBWiP
TAPAS
2011 : 25 / 45 => 55.6%
55.6%April
TIME
2017 : 20 / 36 => 55.6%
2016 : 21 / 46 => 45.7%
2015 : 17 / 23 => 73.9%
2014 : 17 / 32 => 53.1%
2013 : 15 / 26 => 57.7%
2012 : 16 / 32 => 50%
54.4%OctoberBWiP
WABI
2017 : 27 / 55 => 49.1%
2016 : 27 / 56 => 48.2%
2015 : 23 / 56 => 41.1%
2014 : 26 / 61 => 42.6%
2013 : 27 / 61 => 44.3%
2012 : 35 / 92 => 38%
2011 : 30 / 77 => 39%
2010 : 30 / 83 => 36.1%
2009 : 34 / 90 => 37.8%
2008 : 32 / 81 => 39.5%
2007 : 38 / 133 => 28.6%
2006 : 36 / 100 => 36%
2005 : 35 / 94 => 37.2%
2004 : 39 / 117 => 33.3%
2003 : 36 / 78 => 46.2%
2002 : 39 / 83 => 47%
2001 : 23 / 50 => 46%
39.3%JulyBB
WADS
2017 : 49 / 109 => 45%
2015 : 54 / 148 => 36.5%
2013 : 44 / 139 => 31.7%
2011 : 59 / 141 => 41.8%
2009 : 49 / 126 => 38.9%
2007 : 54 / 142 => 38%
2005 : 37 / 90 => 41.1%
2003 : 40 / 126 => 31.7%
2001 : 40 / 89 => 44.9%
38.4%AugustBB
WALCOM
2017 : 35 / 83 => 42.2%
2016 : 27 / 68 => 39.7%
2015 : 26 / 85 => 30.6%
2014 : 29 / 62 => 46.8%
2013 : 29 / 86 => 33.7%
2012 : 20 / 50 => 40%
2011 : 20 / 57 => 35.1%
2010 : 23 / 60 => 38.3%
2009 : 30 / 102 => 29.4%
2008 : 19 / 57 => 33.3%
36.3%FebruaryCWiP
WAOA
2016 : 16 / 33 => 48.5%
2015 : 17 / 40 => 42.5%
2014 : 22 / 49 => 44.9%
2013 : 14 / 33 => 42.4%
2012 : 22 / 60 => 36.7%
2011 : 21 / 48 => 43.8%
2010 : 23 / 58 => 39.7%
2009 : 22 / 62 => 35.5%
2008 : 22 / 56 => 39.3%
2007 : 22 / 56 => 39.3%
2006 : 26 / 62 => 41.9%
40.8%SeptemberBWiP
WG
2017 : 31 / 71 => 43.7%
2016 : 25 / 74 => 33.8%
2015 : 32 / 79 => 40.5%
2014 : 32 / 80 => 40%
2013 : 34 / 61 => 55.7%
2012 : 29 / 78 => 37.2%
2011 : 28 / 52 => 53.8%
2010 : 28 / 94 => 29.8%
2009 : 28 / 69 => 40.6%
2008 : 30 / 76 => 39.5%
2007 : 30 / 99 => 30.3%
2006 : 30 / 91 => 33%
38.6%JuneAB
Last modification: November 09 2017