Acceptance ratio of some Theoretical Computer Science Conferences

Here is a list of some acceptance rates of Theoretical Computer Science (TCS) Conferences (and some of computational biology). For each year, you can find the (Number Of Accepted Papers) / (Number Of Submitted Papers), and the corresponding ratio. These data are (manually) collected from the proceedings.

Obviously, the ratio doesn't mean anything about the conference quality or ranking (see for example this post of Lance Fortnow)! See also this interesting experiment on the conferences decisions, and this humoristic study.
Contact me for any remark or suggestion.

Conference Name Year : Accepted / Submitted => Ratio Average ratio Usual month Core 2017 rank
AAIM
2016 : 18 / 41 => 43.9%
2014 : 30 / 45 => 66.7%
2013 : 33 / 60 => 55%
2012 : 33 / 81 => 40.7%
2010 : 31 / 50 => 62%
2009 : 25 / 41 => 61%
2008 : 30 / 53 => 56.6%
2007 : 39 / 120 => 32.5%
48.7%JulyC
ALENEX
2017 : 21 / 52 => 40.4%
2016 : 15 / 38 => 39.5%
2015 : 15 / 54 => 27.8%
2014 : 15 / 68 => 22.1%
2013 : 15 / 47 => 31.9%
2012 : 15 / 49 => 30.6%
2011 : 15 / 47 => 31.9%
2010 : 15 / 53 => 28.3%
2009 : 15 / 64 => 23.4%
2007 : 15 / 60 => 25%
29.3%JanuaryA
APBC
2012 : 42 / 129 => 32.6%
2011 : 54 / 164 => 32.9%
2010 : 67 / 231 => 29%
2009 : 64 / 204 => 31.4%
2008 : 36 / 100 => 36%
2007 : 35 / 104 => 33.7%
32%JanuaryB
APPROX
2016 : 20 / 40 => 50%
2015 : 26 / 61 => 42.6%
2014 : 31 / 64 => 48.4%
2013 : 23 / 46 => 50%
2012 : 28 / 70 => 40%
2011 : 29 / 66 => 43.9%
2010 : 28 / 66 => 42.4%
2009 : 25 / 56 => 44.6%
2008 : 20 / 42 => 47.6%
45%AugustA
AlCoB
2016 : 13 / 23 => 56.5%
2015 : 11 / 23 => 47.8%
2014 : 20 / 39 => 51.3%
51.8%August
CALDAM
2016 : 30 / 91 => 33%
2015 : 26 / 58 => 44.8%
37.6%February
CATS
2013 : 7 / 15 => 46.7%
2012 : 18 / 34 => 52.9%
2011 : 20 / 38 => 52.6%
2010 : 12 / 28 => 42.9%
2009 : 19 / 43 => 44.2%
2008 : 17 / 28 => 60.7%
2007 : 18 / 29 => 62.1%
51.6%February
CIAA
2016 : 26 / 49 => 53.1%
2015 : 22 / 49 => 44.9%
2014 : 21 / 36 => 58.3%
2013 : 25 / 43 => 58.1%
2012 : 21 / 53 => 39.6%
2011 : 20 / 38 => 52.6%
2010 : 26 / 52 => 50%
2009 : 23 / 42 => 54.8%
2008 : 24 / 40 => 60%
2007 : 23 / 79 => 29.1%
48%JulyB
CIAC
2015 : 30 / 93 => 32.3%
2013 : 31 / 75 => 41.3%
2010 : 30 / 114 => 26.3%
2006 : 33 / 80 => 41.3%
2003 : 23 / 57 => 40.4%
2000 : 21 / 41 => 51.2%
36.5%MayC
COCOA
2016 : 60 / 122 => 49.2%
2015 : 59 / 125 => 47.2%
2014 : 56 / 133 => 42.1%
2013 : 36 / 72 => 50%
2012 : 33 / 57 => 57.9%
2011 : 30 / 65 => 46.2%
2010 : 49 / 108 => 45.4%
2009 : 50 / 103 => 48.5%
2008 : 44 / 84 => 52.4%
48%DecemberB
COCOON
2016 : 50 / 113 => 44.2%
2014 : 51 / 110 => 46.4%
2013 : 56 / 120 => 46.7%
2012 : 50 / 121 => 41.3%
2011 : 54 / 136 => 39.7%
2010 : 54 / 133 => 40.6%
2009 : 51 / 125 => 40.8%
2008 : 66 / 172 => 38.4%
2007 : 51 / 154 => 33.1%
2006 : 52 / 137 => 38%
40.5%AugustA
COLT
2017 : 74 / 228 => 32.5%
2016 : 53 / 203 => 26.1%
2015 : 62 / 178 => 34.8%
2014 : 45 / 140 => 32.1%
2013 : 47 / 90 => 52.2%
2012 : 47 / 140 => 33.6%
33.5%JuneA*
CPM
2016 : 29 / 52 => 55.8%
2015 : 34 / 83 => 41%
2014 : 28 / 54 => 51.9%
2013 : 21 / 51 => 41.2%
2012 : 33 / 60 => 55%
2011 : 36 / 70 => 51.4%
2010 : 28 / 53 => 52.8%
2009 : 27 / 63 => 42.9%
2008 : 25 / 78 => 32.1%
2007 : 32 / 64 => 50%
2006 : 33 / 88 => 37.5%
2005 : 37 / 129 => 28.7%
2004 : 36 / 79 => 45.6%
43.2%JuneB
CSR
2016 : 28 / 71 => 39.4%
2015 : 25 / 61 => 41%
2014 : 27 / 76 => 35.5%
2013 : 29 / 52 => 55.8%
2012 : 28 / 66 => 42.4%
2011 : 29 / 76 => 38.2%
2010 : 30 / 62 => 48.4%
2009 : 29 / 66 => 43.9%
2008 : 27 / 62 => 43.5%
2007 : 34 / 95 => 35.8%
41.6%JuneC
CiE
2016 : 18 / 40 => 45%
2015 : 26 / 64 => 40.6%
2014 : 42 / 78 => 53.8%
2013 : 48 / 152 => 31.6%
2012 : 53 / 178 => 29.8%
2011 : 22 / 55 => 40%
2010 : 28 / 90 => 31.1%
2009 : 34 / 100 => 34%
2008 : 36 / 108 => 33.3%
2007 : 50 / 167 => 29.9%
34.6%JuneC
Computational Complexity Conference (CCC)
2016 : 34 / 91 => 37.4%
2015 : 30 / 110 => 27.3%
2014 : 29 / 94 => 30.9%
2013 : 29 / 90 => 32.2%
2012 : 34 / 119 => 28.6%
2011 : 30 / 83 => 36.1%
2010 : 25 / 76 => 32.9%
2009 : 37 / 113 => 32.7%
2008 : 32 / 87 => 36.8%
2007 : 30 / 90 => 33.3%
2006 : 28 / 87 => 32.2%
2005 : 30 / 79 => 38%
32.9%JuneA
DISC
2016 : 32 / 132 => 24.2%
2015 : 42 / 143 => 29.4%
2014 : 35 / 148 => 23.6%
2013 : 27 / 142 => 19%
2012 : 27 / 119 => 22.7%
2011 : 31 / 136 => 22.8%
2010 : 32 / 135 => 23.7%
23.7%OctoberA
DLT
2016 : 32 / 48 => 66.7%
2015 : 31 / 54 => 57.4%
2014 : 22 / 38 => 57.9%
2013 : 34 / 63 => 54%
2011 : 34 / 69 => 49.3%
2010 : 32 / 60 => 53.3%
2009 : 35 / 70 => 50%
2008 : 36 / 102 => 35.3%
2007 : 32 / 74 => 43.2%
2006 : 36 / 63 => 57.1%
2005 : 29 / 73 => 39.7%
49.4%JuneB
Design and Analysis of Algorithms (MedAlg)
2012 : 18 / 44 => 40.9%
40.9%December
European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA) Track A
2016 : 63 / 230 => 27.4%
2015 : 25 / 93 => 26.9%
2014 : 57 / 221 => 25.8%
2013 : 53 / 229 => 23.1%
2012 : 56 / 231 => 24.2%
2011 : 55 / 209 => 26.3%
2010 : 56 / 206 => 27.2%
2009 : 56 / 222 => 25.2%
2008 : 51 / 147 => 34.7%
2007 : 50 / 165 => 30.3%
2006 : 52 / 215 => 24.2%
26.5%SeptemberA
EvoCOP
2016 : 17 / 44 => 38.6%
2015 : 19 / 46 => 41.3%
2014 : 20 / 42 => 47.6%
2013 : 23 / 50 => 46%
2012 : 22 / 48 => 45.8%
2011 : 22 / 42 => 52.4%
2009 : 21 / 53 => 39.6%
2008 : 24 / 69 => 34.8%
2007 : 21 / 81 => 25.9%
39.8%April
FAW
2016 : 25 / 54 => 46.3%
2015 : 28 / 65 => 43.1%
2014 : 30 / 65 => 46.2%
2013 : 33 / 60 => 55%
2012 : 33 / 81 => 40.7%
2011 : 35 / 91 => 38.5%
2010 : 28 / 57 => 49.1%
2009 : 33 / 87 => 37.9%
2008 : 33 / 80 => 41.3%
43.4%MayB
FCT
2015 : 27 / 60 => 45%
2013 : 26 / 58 => 44.8%
2011 : 28 / 78 => 35.9%
2009 : 29 / 67 => 43.3%
2007 : 39 / 147 => 26.5%
2005 : 46 / 105 => 43.8%
37.9%AugustA
FOCS
2016 : 85 / 307 => 27.7%
2015 : 86 / 314 => 27.4%
2014 : 68 / 273 => 24.9%
2013 : 79 / 281 => 28.1%
2012 : 79 / 248 => 31.9%
2011 : 85 / 292 => 29.1%
2010 : 81 / 270 => 30%
2009 : 75 / 249 => 30.1%
2008 : 79 / 276 => 28.6%
2007 : 66 / 302 => 21.9%
2006 : 71 / 240 => 29.6%
2005 : 62 / 272 => 22.8%
27.6%OctoberA*
FOSSACS
2017 : 32 / 101 => 31.7%
2016 : 31 / 85 => 36.5%
2015 : 28 / 93 => 30.1%
2014 : 28 / 106 => 26.4%
2013 : 28 / 109 => 25.7%
2012 : 29 / 100 => 29%
2011 : 30 / 100 => 30%
2010 : 25 / 86 => 29.1%
2009 : 30 / 102 => 29.4%
2008 : 25 / 103 => 24.3%
2007 : 25 / 103 => 24.3%
2006 : 28 / 107 => 26.2%
28.4%MarchA
FSTTCS
2016 : 44 / 112 => 39.3%
2015 : 42 / 117 => 35.9%
2014 : 47 / 162 => 29%
2013 : 40 / 111 => 36%
2012 : 43 / 121 => 35.5%
2011 : 37 / 116 => 31.9%
2010 : 38 / 128 => 29.7%
2009 : 40 / 117 => 34.2%
2008 : 36 / 117 => 30.8%
2007 : 40 / 135 => 29.6%
2006 : 34 / 155 => 21.9%
31.7%DecemberB
FUN
2016 : 25 / 61 => 41%
2014 : 29 / 49 => 59.2%
2012 : 34 / 56 => 60.7%
2010 : 32 / 54 => 59.3%
2007 : 20 / 41 => 48.8%
53.6%JuneB
ICALP A (if possible)
2016 : 89 / 319 => 27.9%
2015 : 143 / 507 => 28.2%
2014 : 136 / 484 => 28.1%
2013 : 124 / 422 => 29.4%
2012 : 71 / 248 => 28.6%
2011 : 60 / 222 => 27%
2010 : 60 / 222 => 27%
2009 : 62 / 223 => 27.8%
2008 : 70 / 269 => 26%
2007 : 41 / 149 => 27.5%
27.9%JulyA
ICCS
2014 : 64 / 184 => 34.8%
2011 : 220 / 580 => 37.9%
2007 : 80 / 360 => 22.2%
2005 : 134 / 464 => 28.9%
31.4%JuneA
ICGT (Graph Transformation)
2015 : 15 / 27 => 55.6%
55.6%July
ICML
2015 : 270 / 1037 => 26%
2012 : 242 / 890 => 27.2%
2011 : 152 / 589 => 25.8%
2010 : 152 / 594 => 25.6%
2009 : 160 / 595 => 26.9%
2008 : 158 / 583 => 27.1%
2003 : 119 / 371 => 32.1%
26.9%AugustA*
IFIP TCS
2014 : 11 / 38 => 28.9%
2012 : 25 / 48 => 52.1%
41.9%SeptemberC
IJCAI
2016 : 551 / 2294 => 24%
2015 : 572 / 1996 => 28.7%
2013 : 413 / 1473 => 28%
2011 : 400 / 1325 => 30.2%
2009 : 331 / 1291 => 25.6%
2007 : 470 / 1365 => 34.4%
28.1%JulyA*
IPCO
2017 : 36 / 125 => 28.8%
2016 : 33 / 125 => 26.4%
2014 : 34 / 143 => 23.8%
2013 : 33 / 98 => 33.7%
2011 : 33 / 110 => 30%
2010 : 34 / 135 => 25.2%
2008 : 32 / 95 => 33.7%
2007 : 36 / 120 => 30%
28.5%AprilA
IPEC
2016 : 28 / 48 => 58.3%
2015 : 32 / 51 => 62.7%
2014 : 27 / 42 => 64.3%
2013 : 29 / 58 => 50%
2012 : 21 / 37 => 56.8%
2011 : 21 / 40 => 52.5%
2010 : 19 / 32 => 59.4%
2009 : 25 / 52 => 48.1%
2008 : 17 / 32 => 53.1%
2004 : 25 / 47 => 53.2%
55.6%July
ISAAC
2016 : 62 / 155 => 40%
2015 : 65 / 180 => 36.1%
2014 : 60 / 171 => 35.1%
2013 : 67 / 177 => 37.9%
2012 : 68 / 174 => 39.1%
2011 : 76 / 187 => 40.6%
2010 : 77 / 182 => 42.3%
2009 : 120 / 279 => 43%
2008 : 78 / 229 => 34.1%
2007 : 77 / 220 => 35%
2006 : 73 / 255 => 28.6%
37.3%DecemberA
ISBRA
2016 : 25 / 77 => 32.5%
2015 : 34 / 98 => 34.7%
2014 : 33 / 119 => 27.7%
2013 : 25 / 46 => 54.3%
2012 : 26 / 66 => 39.4%
2011 : 36 / 92 => 39.1%
2010 : 20 / 57 => 35.1%
2009 : 26 / 55 => 47.3%
2008 : 35 / 94 => 37.2%
2007 : 55 / 144 => 38.2%
37.1%May
ISCO
2016 : 38 / 98 => 38.8%
2014 : 37 / 97 => 38.1%
2012 : 37 / 94 => 39.4%
38.8%May
ISMB/ECCB
2015 : 42 / 241 => 17.4%
2013 : 40 / 233 => 17.2%
2011 : 48 / 258 => 18.6%
2009 : 46 / 242 => 19%
2007 : 66 / 417 => 15.8%
17.4%July
ITCS Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science
2016 : 40 / 145 => 27.6%
2015 : 45 / 159 => 28.3%
2014 : 48 / 116 => 41.4%
2013 : 49 / 123 => 39.8%
2012 : 39 / 93 => 41.9%
34.7%January
IWOCA
2016 : 35 / 87 => 40.2%
2015 : 29 / 90 => 32.2%
2014 : 32 / 69 => 46.4%
2013 : 33 / 91 => 36.3%
2012 : 32 / 88 => 36.4%
2011 : 30 / 71 => 42.3%
2010 : 31 / 85 => 36.5%
2009 : 41 / 100 => 41%
38.6%JulyB
KDD
2015 : 160 / 819 => 19.5%
2014 : 151 / 1036 => 14.6%
2013 : 125 / 726 => 17.2%
2012 : 133 / 755 => 17.6%
2011 : 126 / 714 => 17.6%
2010 : 101 / 679 => 14.9%
2009 : 139 / 659 => 21.1%
2008 : 118 / 593 => 19.9%
2007 : 111 / 573 => 19.4%
17.8%AugustA*
LAGOS
2013 : 60 / 131 => 45.8%
2009 : 58 / 126 => 46%
45.9%April
LATA
2016 : 42 / 119 => 35.3%
2015 : 53 / 115 => 46.1%
2014 : 45 / 116 => 38.8%
2013 : 45 / 97 => 46.4%
2012 : 41 / 114 => 36%
2011 : 36 / 91 => 39.6%
40.2%MarchC
LATIN
2016 : 52 / 131 => 39.7%
2014 : 65 / 192 => 33.9%
2012 : 55 / 153 => 35.9%
2010 : 56 / 155 => 36.1%
2008 : 66 / 242 => 27.3%
2006 : 66 / 224 => 29.5%
2004 : 59 / 178 => 33.1%
2002 : 44 / 104 => 42.3%
33.6%AprilB
MFCS
2016 : 84 / 195 => 43.1%
2015 : 82 / 201 => 40.8%
2014 : 95 / 270 => 35.2%
2013 : 67 / 191 => 35.1%
2012 : 63 / 162 => 38.9%
2011 : 48 / 129 => 37.2%
2010 : 56 / 149 => 37.6%
2009 : 56 / 148 => 37.8%
2008 : 45 / 119 => 37.8%
2007 : 61 / 167 => 36.5%
2006 : 62 / 174 => 35.6%
37.7%AugustA
OPODIS
2016 : 31 / 84 => 36.9%
2015 : 31 / 91 => 34.1%
2014 : 32 / 98 => 32.7%
2013 : 19 / 41 => 46.3%
2012 : 24 / 89 => 27%
2011 : 26 / 96 => 27.1%
2009 : 23 / 72 => 31.9%
2008 : 30 / 102 => 29.4%
32.1%DecemberB
PODC
2016 : 40 / 137 => 29.2%
2015 : 45 / 191 => 23.6%
2014 : 39 / 141 => 27.7%
2013 : 37 / 145 => 25.5%
2012 : 35 / 142 => 24.6%
2011 : 34 / 129 => 26.4%
2010 : 39 / 179 => 21.8%
2009 : 27 / 110 => 24.5%
25.2%JulyA*
RECOMB
2017 : 22 / 184 => 12%
2016 : 35 / 172 => 20.3%
2015 : 36 / 170 => 21.2%
2014 : 35 / 154 => 22.7%
2013 : 32 / 167 => 19.2%
2012 : 31 / 200 => 15.5%
2011 : 43 / 153 => 28.1%
2010 : 36 / 176 => 20.5%
2009 : 37 / 166 => 22.3%
2008 : 34 / 193 => 17.6%
2007 : 37 / 170 => 21.8%
2006 : 39 / 217 => 18%
19.7%AprilB
RECOMB-CG
2014 : 20 / 33 => 60.6%
2010 : 24 / 35 => 68.6%
2009 : 19 / 31 => 61.3%
2008 : 19 / 48 => 39.6%
2007 : 14 / 18 => 77.8%
2006 : 17 / 34 => 50%
2005 : 14 / 21 => 66.7%
57.7%October
SEA Symposium on Experimental Algorithms
2016 : 25 / 54 => 46.3%
2015 : 30 / 76 => 39.5%
2014 : 36 / 81 => 44.4%
2013 : 32 / 73 => 43.8%
2012 : 31 / 64 => 48.4%
2011 : 36 / 83 => 43.4%
2010 : 40 / 73 => 54.8%
2009 : 23 / 64 => 35.9%
2007 : 30 / 121 => 24.8%
2006 : 26 / 92 => 28.3%
2005 : 47 / 176 => 26.7%
37.2%JuneB
SIROCCO
2016 : 25 / 50 => 50%
2015 : 30 / 78 => 38.5%
2014 : 24 / 51 => 47.1%
2013 : 28 / 67 => 41.8%
2012 : 28 / 54 => 51.9%
2011 : 24 / 57 => 42.1%
2010 : 19 / 37 => 51.4%
2009 : 23 / 53 => 43.4%
2008 : 22 / 52 => 42.3%
2007 : 23 / 66 => 34.8%
2006 : 24 / 68 => 35.3%
42.7%JuneB
SODA
2017 : 181 / 533 => 34%
2016 : 149 / 527 => 28.3%
2015 : 137 / 495 => 27.7%
2014 : 136 / 485 => 28%
2013 : 135 / 454 => 29.7%
2012 : 138 / 517 => 26.7%
2011 : 136 / 452 => 30.1%
2010 : 135 / 445 => 30.3%
2009 : 135 / 458 => 29.5%
2008 : 135 / 455 => 29.7%
2007 : 139 / 382 => 36.4%
2006 : 135 / 440 => 30.7%
2005 : 135 / 488 => 27.7%
29.8%JanuaryA*
SOFSEM
2017 : 34 / 41 => 82.9%
2016 : 43 / 116 => 37.1%
2015 : 42 / 101 => 41.6%
2014 : 40 / 104 => 38.5%
2013 : 37 / 98 => 37.8%
2012 : 43 / 121 => 35.5%
2011 : 41 / 122 => 33.6%
2010 : 53 / 134 => 39.6%
2009 : 49 / 132 => 37.1%
2008 : 57 / 162 => 35.2%
2007 : 69 / 283 => 24.4%
2006 : 45 / 157 => 28.7%
35.2%JanuaryB
SPIRE
2016 : 25 / 46 => 54.3%
2015 : 34 / 90 => 37.8%
2014 : 20 / 45 => 44.4%
2013 : 18 / 60 => 30%
2012 : 26 / 81 => 32.1%
2011 : 30 / 102 => 29.4%
2010 : 39 / 109 => 35.8%
2009 : 34 / 84 => 40.5%
2008 : 25 / 54 => 46.3%
2007 : 27 / 77 => 35.1%
2006 : 31 / 102 => 30.4%
36.4%OctoberB
SSS
2016 : 23 / 53 => 43.4%
2015 : 16 / 38 => 42.1%
2014 : 21 / 44 => 47.7%
2013 : 23 / 68 => 33.8%
2012 : 21 / 75 => 28%
2011 : 29 / 79 => 36.7%
2009 : 49 / 126 => 38.9%
37.7%OctoberC
STACS
2017 : 54 / 212 => 25.5%
2016 : 54 / 205 => 26.3%
2015 : 55 / 235 => 23.4%
2014 : 54 / 210 => 25.7%
2013 : 54 / 254 => 21.3%
2012 : 54 / 273 => 19.8%
2011 : 54 / 271 => 19.9%
2010 : 54 / 238 => 22.7%
2009 : 54 / 280 => 19.3%
2008 : 54 / 200 => 27%
2007 : 56 / 400 => 14%
2006 : 54 / 283 => 19.1%
21.3%MarchB
STOC
2017 : 103 / 422 => 24.4%
2016 : 92 / 370 => 24.9%
2015 : 93 / 347 => 26.8%
2014 : 91 / 319 => 28.5%
2013 : 100 / 360 => 27.8%
2012 : 89 / 303 => 29.4%
2011 : 84 / 304 => 27.6%
2010 : 78 / 279 => 28%
2009 : 77 / 329 => 23.4%
2008 : 80 / 325 => 24.6%
2007 : 77 / 312 => 24.7%
2006 : 78 / 288 => 27.1%
26.3%JuneA*
SWAT
2016 : 30 / 90 => 33.3%
2014 : 33 / 134 => 24.6%
2012 : 34 / 127 => 26.8%
2010 : 36 / 78 => 46.2%
2008 : 36 / 111 => 32.4%
2006 : 36 / 154 => 23.4%
2004 : 40 / 121 => 33.1%
30.1%July
TAMC
2017 : 45 / 103 => 43.7%
2015 : 35 / 78 => 44.9%
2014 : 27 / 112 => 24.1%
2013 : 31 / 70 => 44.3%
2012 : 40 / 86 => 46.5%
2011 : 51 / 136 => 37.5%
2010 : 35 / 76 => 46.1%
2009 : 39 / 86 => 45.3%
2008 : 48 / 192 => 25%
2007 : 67 / 500 => 13.4%
2006 : 75 / 319 => 23.5%
28%MayB
TAPAS
2011 : 25 / 45 => 55.6%
55.6%April
TIME
2016 : 21 / 46 => 45.7%
2015 : 17 / 23 => 73.9%
2014 : 17 / 32 => 53.1%
2013 : 15 / 26 => 57.7%
2012 : 16 / 32 => 50%
54.1%OctoberB
WABI
2016 : 27 / 56 => 48.2%
2015 : 23 / 56 => 41.1%
2014 : 26 / 61 => 42.6%
2013 : 27 / 61 => 44.3%
2012 : 35 / 92 => 38%
2011 : 30 / 77 => 39%
2010 : 30 / 83 => 36.1%
2009 : 34 / 90 => 37.8%
2008 : 32 / 81 => 39.5%
2007 : 38 / 133 => 28.6%
2006 : 36 / 100 => 36%
2005 : 35 / 94 => 37.2%
2004 : 39 / 117 => 33.3%
2003 : 36 / 78 => 46.2%
2002 : 39 / 83 => 47%
2001 : 23 / 50 => 46%
38.9%JulyB
WADS
2017 : 49 / 109 => 45%
2015 : 54 / 148 => 36.5%
2013 : 44 / 139 => 31.7%
2011 : 59 / 141 => 41.8%
2009 : 49 / 126 => 38.9%
2007 : 54 / 142 => 38%
2005 : 37 / 90 => 41.1%
2003 : 40 / 126 => 31.7%
2001 : 40 / 89 => 44.9%
38.4%AugustB
WALCOM
2017 : 35 / 83 => 42.2%
2016 : 27 / 68 => 39.7%
2015 : 26 / 85 => 30.6%
2014 : 29 / 62 => 46.8%
2013 : 29 / 86 => 33.7%
2012 : 20 / 50 => 40%
2011 : 20 / 57 => 35.1%
2010 : 23 / 60 => 38.3%
2009 : 30 / 102 => 29.4%
2008 : 19 / 57 => 33.3%
36.3%FebruaryC
WAOA
2016 : 16 / 33 => 48.5%
2015 : 17 / 40 => 42.5%
2014 : 22 / 49 => 44.9%
2013 : 14 / 33 => 42.4%
2012 : 22 / 60 => 36.7%
2011 : 21 / 48 => 43.8%
2010 : 23 / 58 => 39.7%
2009 : 22 / 62 => 35.5%
2008 : 22 / 56 => 39.3%
2007 : 22 / 56 => 39.3%
2006 : 26 / 62 => 41.9%
40.8%SeptemberB
WG
2016 : 25 / 74 => 33.8%
2015 : 32 / 79 => 40.5%
2014 : 32 / 80 => 40%
2013 : 34 / 61 => 55.7%
2012 : 29 / 78 => 37.2%
2011 : 28 / 52 => 53.8%
2010 : 28 / 94 => 29.8%
2009 : 28 / 69 => 40.6%
2008 : 30 / 76 => 39.5%
2007 : 30 / 99 => 30.3%
2006 : 30 / 91 => 33%
38.2%JuneA
Last modification: June 26 2017