Acceptance ratio of some Theoretical Computer Science Conferences

Here is a list of some acceptance rates of Theoretical Computer Science (TCS) Conferences (and some of computational biology). For each year, you can find the (Number Of Accepted Papers) / (Number Of Submitted Papers), and the corresponding ratio. These data are (manually) collected from the proceedings.

Obviously, the ratio doesn't mean anything about the conference quality (see for example this post of Lance Fortnow)! Contact me for any remark or suggestion.

Conference Name Year : Accepted / Submitted => Ratio Average ratio
AAIM
2013 : 33 / 60 => 55%
2012 : 33 / 81 => 40.7%
2010 : 31 / 50 => 62%
2009 : 25 / 41 => 61%
2008 : 30 / 53 => 56.6%
2007 : 39 / 120 => 32.5%
47.2%
ALENEX
2013 : 15 / 47 => 31.9%
2012 : 15 / 49 => 30.6%
2011 : 15 / 47 => 31.9%
2010 : 15 / 53 => 28.3%
2009 : 15 / 64 => 23.4%
2007 : 15 / 60 => 25%
28.1%
APBC
2012 : 42 / 129 => 32.6%
2011 : 54 / 164 => 32.9%
2010 : 67 / 231 => 29%
2009 : 64 / 204 => 31.4%
2008 : 36 / 100 => 36%
2007 : 35 / 104 => 33.7%
32%
APPROX
2013 : 23 / 46 => 50%
2012 : 28 / 70 => 40%
2011 : 29 / 66 => 43.9%
2010 : 28 / 66 => 42.4%
2009 : 25 / 56 => 44.6%
2008 : 20 / 42 => 47.6%
44.2%
BSB
2009 : 18 / 55 => 32.7%
2008 : 19 / 41 => 46.3%
2007 : 19 / 60 => 31.7%
35.9%
CATS
2013 : 7 / 15 => 46.7%
2012 : 18 / 34 => 52.9%
2011 : 20 / 38 => 52.6%
2010 : 12 / 28 => 42.9%
2009 : 19 / 43 => 44.2%
2008 : 17 / 28 => 60.7%
2007 : 18 / 29 => 62.1%
51.6%
CIAA
2013 : 25 / 43 => 58.1%
2012 : 21 / 53 => 39.6%
2011 : 20 / 38 => 52.6%
2010 : 26 / 52 => 50%
2009 : 23 / 42 => 54.8%
2008 : 24 / 40 => 60%
2007 : 23 / 79 => 29.1%
46.7%
CIAC
2013 : 31 / 75 => 41.3%
2010 : 30 / 114 => 26.3%
2006 : 33 / 80 => 41.3%
2003 : 23 / 57 => 40.4%
2000 : 21 / 41 => 51.2%
37.6%
COCOA
2013 : 36 / 72 => 50%
2012 : 33 / 57 => 57.9%
2011 : 30 / 65 => 46.2%
2010 : 49 / 108 => 45.4%
2009 : 50 / 103 => 48.5%
2008 : 44 / 84 => 52.4%
49.5%
COCOON
2013 : 56 / 120 => 46.7%
2012 : 50 / 121 => 41.3%
2011 : 54 / 136 => 39.7%
2010 : 54 / 133 => 40.6%
2009 : 51 / 125 => 40.8%
2008 : 66 / 172 => 38.4%
2007 : 51 / 154 => 33.1%
2006 : 52 / 137 => 38%
39.5%
CPM
2013 : 21 / 51 => 41.2%
2012 : 33 / 60 => 55%
2011 : 36 / 70 => 51.4%
2010 : 28 / 53 => 52.8%
2009 : 27 / 63 => 42.9%
2008 : 25 / 78 => 32.1%
2007 : 32 / 64 => 50%
2006 : 33 / 88 => 37.5%
44.6%
CSR
2013 : 29 / 52 => 55.8%
2012 : 28 / 66 => 42.4%
2011 : 29 / 76 => 38.2%
2010 : 30 / 62 => 48.4%
2009 : 29 / 66 => 43.9%
2008 : 27 / 62 => 43.5%
2007 : 34 / 95 => 35.8%
43%
CiE
2013 : 48 / 152 => 31.6%
2012 : 53 / 178 => 29.8%
2011 : 22 / 55 => 40%
2010 : 28 / 90 => 31.1%
2009 : 34 / 100 => 34%
2008 : 36 / 108 => 33.3%
2007 : 50 / 167 => 29.9%
31.9%
DLT
2013 : 34 / 63 => 54%
2011 : 34 / 69 => 49.3%
2010 : 32 / 60 => 53.3%
2009 : 35 / 70 => 50%
2008 : 36 / 102 => 35.3%
2007 : 32 / 74 => 43.2%
2006 : 36 / 63 => 57.1%
2005 : 29 / 73 => 39.7%
46.7%
Design and Analysis of Algorithms (MedAlg)
2012 : 18 / 44 => 40.9%
40.9%
ESA
2013 : 69 / 303 => 22.8%
2012 : 69 / 285 => 24.2%
2011 : 67 / 255 => 26.3%
2010 : 66 / 245 => 26.9%
2009 : 46 / 272 => 16.9%
2008 : 67 / 200 => 33.5%
2007 : 70 / 280 => 25%
24.7%
EvoCOP
2013 : 23 / 50 => 46%
2012 : 22 / 48 => 45.8%
2011 : 22 / 42 => 52.4%
2009 : 21 / 53 => 39.6%
2008 : 24 / 69 => 34.8%
2007 : 21 / 81 => 25.9%
38.8%
FAW
2013 : 33 / 60 => 55%
2012 : 33 / 81 => 40.7%
2011 : 35 / 91 => 38.5%
2010 : 28 / 57 => 49.1%
2009 : 33 / 87 => 37.9%
2008 : 33 / 80 => 41.3%
42.8%
FCT
2013 : 26 / 58 => 44.8%
2011 : 28 / 78 => 35.9%
2009 : 29 / 67 => 43.3%
2007 : 39 / 147 => 26.5%
2005 : 46 / 105 => 43.8%
36.9%
FOCS
2013 : 79 / 281 => 28.1%
2012 : 79 / 248 => 31.9%
2011 : 85 / 292 => 29.1%
2010 : 81 / 270 => 30%
2009 : 75 / 249 => 30.1%
2008 : 79 / 276 => 28.6%
2007 : 66 / 302 => 21.9%
2006 : 71 / 240 => 29.6%
2005 : 62 / 272 => 22.8%
27.9%
FOSSACS
2013 : 28 / 109 => 25.7%
2012 : 29 / 100 => 29%
2011 : 30 / 100 => 30%
2010 : 25 / 86 => 29.1%
2009 : 30 / 102 => 29.4%
2008 : 25 / 103 => 24.3%
2007 : 25 / 103 => 24.3%
2006 : 28 / 107 => 26.2%
27.2%
FSTTCS
2013 : 40 / 111 => 36%
2012 : 43 / 121 => 35.5%
2011 : 37 / 116 => 31.9%
2010 : 38 / 128 => 29.7%
2009 : 40 / 117 => 34.2%
2008 : 36 / 117 => 30.8%
2007 : 40 / 135 => 29.6%
2006 : 34 / 155 => 21.9%
30.8%
FUN
2012 : 34 / 56 => 60.7%
2010 : 32 / 54 => 59.3%
2007 : 20 / 41 => 48.8%
57%
ICALP A (if possible)
2013 : 124 / 422 => 29.4%
2012 : 71 / 248 => 28.6%
2011 : 60 / 222 => 27%
2010 : 60 / 222 => 27%
2009 : 62 / 223 => 27.8%
2008 : 70 / 269 => 26%
2007 : 41 / 149 => 27.5%
27.8%
IEEE CCC
2013 : 29 / 90 => 32.2%
2012 : 34 / 119 => 28.6%
2011 : 30 / 83 => 36.1%
2010 : 25 / 76 => 32.9%
2009 : 37 / 113 => 32.7%
2008 : 32 / 87 => 36.8%
2007 : 30 / 90 => 33.3%
2006 : 28 / 87 => 32.2%
2005 : 30 / 79 => 38%
33.4%
IFIP TCS
2012 : 25 / 48 => 52.1%
52.1%
IPCO
2013 : 33 / 98 => 33.7%
2011 : 33 / 110 => 30%
2010 : 34 / 135 => 25.2%
2008 : 32 / 95 => 33.7%
2007 : 36 / 120 => 30%
30.1%
IPEC
2013 : 29 / 58 => 50%
2012 : 21 / 37 => 56.8%
2011 : 21 / 40 => 52.5%
2010 : 19 / 32 => 59.4%
2009 : 25 / 52 => 48.1%
2008 : 17 / 32 => 53.1%
2004 : 25 / 47 => 53.2%
52.7%
ISAAC
2013 : 67 / 177 => 37.9%
2012 : 68 / 174 => 39.1%
2011 : 76 / 187 => 40.6%
2010 : 77 / 182 => 42.3%
2009 : 120 / 279 => 43%
2008 : 78 / 229 => 34.1%
2007 : 77 / 220 => 35%
2006 : 73 / 255 => 28.6%
37.3%
ISBRA
2013 : 25 / 46 => 54.3%
2012 : 26 / 66 => 39.4%
2011 : 36 / 92 => 39.1%
2010 : 20 / 57 => 35.1%
2009 : 26 / 55 => 47.3%
2008 : 35 / 94 => 37.2%
2007 : 55 / 144 => 38.2%
40.3%
ISCO
2012 : 37 / 94 => 39.4%
39.4%
ISMB/ECCB
2011 : 48 / 258 => 18.6%
2009 : 46 / 242 => 19%
2007 : 66 / 417 => 15.8%
17.4%
ITCS Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science
2014 : 48 / 116 => 41.4%
2013 : 49 / 123 => 39.8%
2012 : 39 / 93 => 41.9%
41%
IWOCA
2013 : 33 / 91 => 36.3%
2012 : 32 / 88 => 36.4%
2011 : 30 / 71 => 42.3%
2010 : 31 / 85 => 36.5%
2009 : 41 / 100 => 41%
38.4%
KDD
2013 : 125 / 726 => 17.2%
2012 : 133 / 755 => 17.6%
2011 : 126 / 714 => 17.6%
2010 : 101 / 679 => 14.9%
2009 : 139 / 659 => 21.1%
2008 : 118 / 593 => 19.9%
2007 : 111 / 573 => 19.4%
18.2%
LATIN
2014 : 65 / 192 => 33.9%
2012 : 55 / 153 => 35.9%
2010 : 56 / 155 => 36.1%
2008 : 66 / 242 => 27.3%
2006 : 66 / 224 => 29.5%
2004 : 59 / 178 => 33.1%
2002 : 44 / 104 => 42.3%
32.9%
MFCS
2013 : 67 / 191 => 35.1%
2012 : 63 / 162 => 38.9%
2011 : 48 / 129 => 37.2%
2010 : 56 / 149 => 37.6%
2009 : 56 / 148 => 37.8%
2008 : 45 / 119 => 37.8%
2007 : 61 / 167 => 36.5%
2006 : 62 / 174 => 35.6%
37%
MedAlg
2012 : 18 / 44 => 40.9%
40.9%
RECOMB
2013 : 32 / 167 => 19.2%
2012 : 31 / 200 => 15.5%
2011 : 43 / 153 => 28.1%
2010 : 36 / 176 => 20.5%
2009 : 37 / 166 => 22.3%
2008 : 34 / 193 => 17.6%
2007 : 37 / 170 => 21.8%
2006 : 39 / 217 => 18%
20%
RECOMB-CG
2010 : 24 / 35 => 68.6%
2009 : 19 / 31 => 61.3%
2008 : 19 / 48 => 39.6%
2007 : 14 / 18 => 77.8%
2006 : 17 / 34 => 50%
2005 : 14 / 21 => 66.7%
57.2%
SEA Symposium on Experimental Algorithms
2013 : 32 / 73 => 43.8%
2012 : 31 / 64 => 48.4%
2011 : 36 / 83 => 43.4%
2010 : 40 / 73 => 54.8%
2009 : 23 / 64 => 35.9%
2007 : 30 / 121 => 24.8%
2006 : 26 / 92 => 28.3%
2005 : 47 / 176 => 26.7%
35.5%
SIROCCO
2013 : 28 / 67 => 41.8%
2012 : 28 / 54 => 51.9%
2011 : 24 / 57 => 42.1%
2010 : 19 / 37 => 51.4%
2009 : 23 / 53 => 43.4%
2008 : 22 / 52 => 42.3%
2007 : 23 / 66 => 34.8%
2006 : 24 / 68 => 35.3%
42.1%
SODA
2013 : 135 / 454 => 29.7%
2012 : 138 / 517 => 26.7%
2011 : 136 / 452 => 30.1%
2010 : 135 / 445 => 30.3%
2009 : 135 / 458 => 29.5%
2008 : 135 / 455 => 29.7%
2007 : 139 / 382 => 36.4%
2006 : 135 / 440 => 30.7%
2005 : 135 / 488 => 27.7%
29.9%
SOFSEM
2014 : 40 / 104 => 38.5%
2013 : 37 / 98 => 37.8%
2012 : 43 / 121 => 35.5%
2011 : 41 / 122 => 33.6%
2010 : 53 / 134 => 39.6%
2009 : 49 / 132 => 37.1%
2008 : 57 / 162 => 35.2%
2007 : 69 / 283 => 24.4%
2006 : 45 / 157 => 28.7%
33.1%
SPIRE
2013 : 18 / 60 => 30%
2012 : 26 / 81 => 32.1%
2011 : 30 / 102 => 29.4%
2010 : 39 / 109 => 35.8%
2009 : 34 / 84 => 40.5%
2008 : 25 / 54 => 46.3%
2007 : 27 / 77 => 35.1%
2006 : 31 / 102 => 30.4%
34.4%
STACS
2014 : 54 / 210 => 25.7%
2013 : 54 / 254 => 21.3%
2012 : 54 / 273 => 19.8%
2011 : 54 / 271 => 19.9%
2010 : 54 / 238 => 22.7%
2009 : 54 / 280 => 19.3%
2008 : 54 / 200 => 27%
2007 : 56 / 400 => 14%
2006 : 54 / 283 => 19.1%
20.3%
STOC
2013 : 100 / 360 => 27.8%
2012 : 89 / 303 => 29.4%
2011 : 84 / 304 => 27.6%
2010 : 78 / 279 => 28%
2009 : 77 / 329 => 23.4%
2008 : 80 / 325 => 24.6%
2007 : 77 / 312 => 24.7%
2006 : 78 / 288 => 27.1%
26.5%
SWAT
2012 : 34 / 127 => 26.8%
2010 : 36 / 78 => 46.2%
2008 : 36 / 111 => 32.4%
2006 : 36 / 154 => 23.4%
2004 : 40 / 121 => 33.1%
30.8%
TAMC
2013 : 31 / 70 => 44.3%
2012 : 40 / 86 => 46.5%
2011 : 51 / 136 => 37.5%
2010 : 35 / 76 => 46.1%
2009 : 39 / 86 => 45.3%
2008 : 48 / 192 => 25%
2007 : 67 / 500 => 13.4%
2006 : 75 / 319 => 23.5%
26.3%
TAPAS
2011 : 25 / 45 => 55.6%
55.6%
WABI
2013 : 27 / 61 => 44.3%
2012 : 35 / 92 => 38%
2011 : 30 / 77 => 39%
2010 : 30 / 83 => 36.1%
2009 : 34 / 90 => 37.8%
2008 : 32 / 81 => 39.5%
2007 : 36 / 100 => 36%
38.4%
WADS
2013 : 44 / 139 => 31.7%
2011 : 59 / 141 => 41.8%
2009 : 49 / 126 => 38.9%
2007 : 54 / 142 => 38%
2005 : 37 / 90 => 41.1%
2003 : 40 / 126 => 31.7%
2001 : 40 / 89 => 44.9%
37.9%
WALCOM
2014 : 29 / 62 => 46.8%
2013 : 29 / 86 => 33.7%
2012 : 20 / 50 => 40%
2011 : 20 / 57 => 35.1%
2010 : 23 / 60 => 38.3%
2009 : 30 / 102 => 29.4%
2008 : 19 / 57 => 33.3%
35.9%
WAOA
2012 : 22 / 60 => 36.7%
2011 : 21 / 48 => 43.8%
2010 : 23 / 58 => 39.7%
2009 : 22 / 62 => 35.5%
2008 : 22 / 56 => 39.3%
2007 : 22 / 56 => 39.3%
2006 : 26 / 62 => 41.9%
39.3%
WG
2013 : 34 / 61 => 55.7%
2012 : 29 / 78 => 37.2%
2011 : 28 / 52 => 53.8%
2010 : 28 / 94 => 29.8%
2009 : 28 / 69 => 40.6%
2008 : 30 / 76 => 39.5%
2007 : 30 / 99 => 30.3%
2006 : 30 / 91 => 33%
38.2%
Last modification: March 03 2014